SVG (scalable vector graphics) is often perceived as an “icon format”, but in fact it is a way to describe web graphics through xml code, where mathematical formulas and mathematical paths work instead of pixel grid. This approach makes the image resolution independent: scale at least twice, even ten times, and you will not get the soap characteristic of raster images. Plus, the transparent background remains, and small file size is often achieved even without complex magic. But the magic is still there, and it’s in the details of structure, styles, optimization, and accessibility.
Vector Versus Raster: Why Scale Is More Important Than Habit

Raster images are based on pixels. Their quality is tied to resolution, and when stretched, artifacts and blurred edges appear. SVG works differently: it stores curves, nodes, and coordinates, so infinite scalability becomes a practice rather than a slogan.
This is especially convenient for responsive design. One file can live in different containers, adjusting to the size without a separate set of versions. The impact is visible on both load time and user experience, because the weight of an asset and the complexity of its rendering often decide the outcome.
The article notes that after optimization, a 40-60% reduction in size is typically obtained. This is noticeable on pages where there are a lot of graphics. It also mentions that more “clean” SVGs sometimes give up to ~25% gain in rendering speed if you remove the excess and do not overload the DOM. For mobile assets, the recommendation is stricter: it is better to keep critical files <100 KB so as not to inflate the download and cause interface delays.
SVG Anatomy: ViewBox, Coordinates And Path Complexity

SVG is a text format. It’s really easy to open svg in a regular text editor and see what it consists of, even when working with svg files. Usually, the namespace declaration is at the beginning, followed by the coordinate system, and then the key element is the viewBox. It sets the coordinate frame and determines how the image scales and “fits” into the block.
Geometry is often built via path. Path commands are used inside the path, and absolute coordinates and relative coordinates are found. At first glance, it’s just syntax. In practice, this affects readability and weight: the material estimates that switching to relative coordinates can result in 20-35% savings in path data if the file was overloaded with numbers.
A separate topic is path complexity. Nodes and their number sometimes grow due to exports, and then SVG turns into a bag of dots. Remove metadata, reduce decimal precision, and replace the universal path with suitable primitives when possible. The source material indicates that such a choice of primitives instead of path can result in 8-12% weight savings, which means faster rendering and less memory consumption.
CSS, Interactivity And Accessibility: When SVG Becomes “Alive”

SVG first-class citizens in the DOM. This means that you can control elements through CSS and JavaScript, and not just insert an image as a background. Presentational attributes are often sufficient: fill, stroke, stroke-width, stroke-dasharray, stroke-linecap, stroke-dashoffset. These options allow you to build a neat icon system and maintain a single visual language without duplicating files.
Then interactivity begins. Animations via transitions, line drawing effects via stroke values, micro-hover changes all work without heavy formats. However, it is important not to forget about the 60 FPS benchmark, because an overloaded path and a lot of simultaneous changes quickly turn smoothness into jerks.
Finally, accessibility and SEO. In SVG, the text can be indexable text, and for screen readers, semantic tags are useful: title and desc. Role=”img” and aria-labelledby also help. The material separately notes the risk of “edge” rendering problems of about ~12% if you skip the mandatory structural things, so careful markup is not a formality.
Historically, the format appeared a long time ago: it was proposed in 1994, fixed as an open standard in 1999, and became international in 2003. It is also indicated about the specification: version 2.0 was marked in March 2023. Plus, there are figures about support and prevalence: 96.2% of browsers support CSS custom properties in SVG, usage has increased by 340% since 2020, and about 87% of large sites use SVG. It’s not a fashion. It’s a working tool that wins where scale, control, and speed are important.

Hockey fan, risk-taker, drummer, hand letterer and RGD member. Working at the intersection of modernism and intellectual purity to create strong, lasting and remarkable design. I work with Fortune 500 companies and startups.